Date: Wed, 01 Jun 2005 09:46:18 +0200 From: Christian Brueffer <chris@unixpages.org> To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, iampinetan@netscape.net Subject: Re: The performances of OpenKeta@FreeBSD v0.8-alpha Message-ID: <20050601074618.GB1053@unixpages.org> In-Reply-To: <20050601023829.S31985@odysseus.silby.com> References: <416BAF1E.6B1460E7.0F1E5A0A@netscape.net> <20050601023829.S31985@odysseus.silby.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 02:41:40AM -0500, Mike Silbersack wrote: > > > On Wed, 1 Jun 2005 iampinetan@netscape.net wrote: > > >We use SPECweb99 to experiment 300, 600 and 1000 simultaneous > >connections on four testing platforms including the OpenKETA@FreeBSD on > >FreeBSD v5.3, Apache v1.3.3 on FreeBSD v5.3, Apache v1.3.3 on Redhat > >Enterprise Linux v3.0, and TUX 3.2.14 on Redhat Enterprise Linux v3.0. > > The results look interesting, but I think you need more datapoints. > Apache 1.3 is one of the worst servers in existance for static content > serving; if possible, you should include apache 2.x and thttpd in your > benchmarks for comparison purposes. > > Also, does openketa have a website describing what exactly it does? Is > this a piece of software that will be released soon? > From an earlier mail: http://openketa.sourceforge.net - Christian -- Christian Brueffer chris@unixpages.org brueffer@FreeBSD.org GPG Key: http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFCnWfKbHYXjKDtmC0RAlewAJ0Shye0WI2jeW4sMN1pKjj6ntJ/qwCgqQIm UW1HJEPTydk/TKx3JeuFR4A= =IVSk -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050601074618.GB1053>