Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2014 16:43:28 +0100 (BST) From: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> To: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Cc: freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: RFC: getting rid of oldnfs Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1410241641370.72164@fledge.watson.org> In-Reply-To: <691948956.6194558.1414090646089.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca> References: <691948956.6194558.1414090646089.JavaMail.root@uoguelph.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 23 Oct 2014, Rick Macklem wrote: > Someone just pinged me on this and I figured I should bring it up. > > 1 - Is anyone out there still using oldnfs due to unresolved > problems with the new one? (I am not aware of any outstanding > issues in the new nfs that don't exist in the oldnfs.) > 2 - Does anyone see a problem with getting rid of oldnfs for > FreebSD-11? > 3 - If I get rid of it in -head, I can do it either in mid-December > or mid-April. (I can't do commits during the winter.) > Does anyone have a rough idea when the 11.0 release cycle will > start, so I can choose which of the above would be preferable? > (I figured I'd wait until after the last 10.n release that happens > before 11.0, since it will be easier to MFC before the removal of > oldnfs.) > > Thanks in advance for any comments, rick > ps: John, I've cc'd you since I thought you are the guy most likely to > need to do commits/MFCs to oldnfs. I think removing it is fine, but as early as possible (as John says) to give our -CURRENT users time to stop working around bugs and start reporting them :-). Robert
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.11.1410241641370.72164>