Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Sep 2017 10:37:05 +0200
From:      "Patrick M. Hausen" <hausen@punkt.de>
To:        Aristedes Maniatis <ari@ish.com.au>
Cc:        Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>, freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: ABI changes within stable branch
Message-ID:  <DA4D8888-995B-418B-ACA8-7F600FA43A7C@punkt.de>
In-Reply-To: <21c1d954-8bdf-0d16-f1ca-176cd6df7a60@ish.com.au>
References:  <1b07bf49-508a-c6b4-e805-df7d43230f81@ish.com.au> <20170919081532.GB2170@home.opsec.eu> <21c1d954-8bdf-0d16-f1ca-176cd6df7a60@ish.com.au>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
Hi all,

> Am 19.09.2017 um 10:32 schrieb Aristedes Maniatis <ari@ish.com.au>:
> Then we have a problem since https://pkg.freebsd.org/freebsd:11:x86:64/latest/All/ has been built on 11.1, not on 11.0 (I just tested it with csync2 which I know fails). Packages there may fail to run on 11.0, but there is no clear indication, just random failures at runtime.
> 
> Maybe we'd need specific 11.0, 11.1, 11.2 releases instead of quarterly releases?

This is precisely what we do on our own poudriere - build the quarterly ports branches
on various FreeBSD release versions.

Patrick

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Comment: GPGTools - https://gpgtools.org

iQEcBAEBCgAGBQJZwNcyAAoJEJBvLuLt2olcFjcH/i4C/FvrqSEpGe51PPbJxJ1q
GZtEXzHoVDSD5wnqHEdu8VaZ6MJvIptkpiS5SYGKwCA9bCMUgNh1p8RgeMkTQAAJ
QKNbN75ffZQHnzPN0I4mqW2sNYCKRi3rOdetqxeKlO2sEiZ89exIk/0z1ELT4g8B
Uqbq4kOrvw5KNqzHL8eco5RKNs+Jss45XfBd5JoVHIai2ssqYlE+z4mLMXYfg5AE
ACkOSBv+vVKQtfcDHggZKPQLK+5knUs9NhCxy+WJPdZ376KBk2KbbTAj39BA/afa
gfUwmiicSr+Q0/nhSH4yNw4+ltLwo0H8+ibqfJXaUy7A9qgEMp3aFXUNp+ChJxw=
=tc25
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DA4D8888-995B-418B-ACA8-7F600FA43A7C>