Date: Sat, 7 Jun 2008 15:26:06 -0700 From: Jo Rhett <jrhett@netconsonance.com> To: Dick Hoogendijk <dick@nagual.nl> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: challenge: end of life for 6.2 is premature with buggy 6.3 Message-ID: <1B48EFB7-C3CB-4568-BB86-7CF54A785B94@netconsonance.com> In-Reply-To: <20080608000008.00004a91@westmark> References: <9B7FE91B-9C2E-4732-866C-930AC6022A40@netconsonance.com> <48472DB6.5030909@samsco.org> <6010676B-91B0-4AF8-ACF8-039A59B29331@netconsonance.com> <200806050248.59229.max@love2party.net> <B9B83C12-7130-490D-A4BE-0469711B24DC@netconsonance.com> <20080605083907.GD1028@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <902E9703E6E50776A17E9F92@utd65257.utdallas.edu> <20080605220244.GP1028@server.vk2pj.dyndns.org> <34E9F0D46D7B9F45EDA38F4C@utd65257.utdallas.edu> <48488D1A.9070105@kutulu.org> <52E265BB-BBB1-439D-B375-D6C6AA04697C@netconsonance.com> <20080608000008.00004a91@westmark>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jun 7, 2008, at 3:00 PM, Dick Hoogendijk wrote: > You are in fact saying 6.3-RELEASE should not have been released at > the > time it was. It should have been posponed 'till some open bugs were > solved. I agree with you that a RELEASE is supposed to be more > mature / > stable then a development version. And you state it is -not- That's direct criticism that I am not willing to make of the contributors. I'm sure everyone did the best they could, and with what they knew at the time. I'm saying that now, in retrospect, it doesn't appear to be a stable release. Forcing everyone to upgrade to a unstable release doesn't seem likely to help improve the situation. -- Jo Rhett Net Consonance : consonant endings by net philanthropy, open source and other randomness
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1B48EFB7-C3CB-4568-BB86-7CF54A785B94>