Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:05:05 +0200 From: Ulf Lilleengen <lulf@pvv.ntnu.no> To: Giancarlo Rubio <gianrubio@gmail.com> Cc: "..."@twoflower.idi.ntnu.no, freebsd-geom@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gvinum Message-ID: <20070617150505.GA37562@twoflower.idi.ntnu.no> In-Reply-To: <d8e57f270706170729q24339ea2p6f44df49c0d58dcb@mail.gmail.com> References: <d8e57f270706161308n6753f74cs5067c04733da3229@mail.gmail.com> <20070617142631.GA33976@twoflower.idi.ntnu.no> <d8e57f270706170729q24339ea2p6f44df49c0d58dcb@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On søn, jun 17, 2007 at 02:29:09pm +0000, Giancarlo Rubio wrote: > > The difference is because of the filesystem layout and metadata, while > > gvinum > > show's you the "raw" disk data size. > > > > When it comes to the negative numbers...I think this might have something > > to do > > with the filesystem and not gvinum. But perhaps you could send the output > > off > > 'gvinum printconfig'? > > gvinum -> printconfig > # Vinum configuration of servidor.AERO, saved at Sun Jun 17 11:28:31 2007 > drive raid53 device /dev/ad7s1a > drive raid52 device /dev/ad6s1a > drive raid51 device /dev/ad4s1a > volume data > plex name data.p0 org raid5 388s vol data > sd name data.p0.s2 drive raid53 len 781422300s driveoffset 265s plex > data.p0 plexoffset 776s > sd name data.p0.s1 drive raid52 len 781422300s driveoffset 265s plex > data.p0 plexoffset 388s > sd name data.p0.s0 drive raid51 len 781419196s driveoffset 265s plex > data.p0 plexoffset 0s > gvinum -> Well, seems ok. Everything works fine, right? Perhaps just a bug in 'df'. Btw, it's not recommended to have different sized subdisk in the array. -- Ulf Lilleengen
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070617150505.GA37562>