Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2005 12:23:21 -0800 From: pete wright <nomadlogic@gmail.com> To: Kim Culhan <w8hdkim@gmail.com> Cc: Subhro <subhro.kar@gmail.com>, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Stable Worldstones - Intel P4 vs AMD Message-ID: <57d710000511271223g5203a330l7ea40336fe4b97f0@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <89dbfdc30511271210t794f8d64y8ab66d919a0ff4fe@mail.gmail.com> References: <89dbfdc30511271135p28ad8fbfv63d226194cb4cba7@mail.gmail.com> <438A0ED6.2050105@gmail.com> <89dbfdc30511271210t794f8d64y8ab66d919a0ff4fe@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11/27/05, Kim Culhan <w8hdkim@gmail.com> wrote: > On 11/27/05, Subhro <subhro.kar@gmail.com> wrote: > > Kim Culhan sat at his 'puter and typed on 11/28/2005 1:05: > > > > Running -Stable make world with recent Intel and AMD hardware > > > yielded some interesting results. > > > Let us have a look at /etc/make.conf. BTW, my *personal* opinion is AMD > > implements much better pipelining and concurrent processing compared to > > the Intel platform. So what you see is not something entirely unexpecte= d. > > No /etc/make.conf in either case > > -kim Are you using the same disks, and disk controllers on each machine? =20 building work+kernel does a fair amount of disk I/O, so that would be one thing to investigate. -p -- ~~o0OO0o~~ Pete Wright www.nycbug.org NYC's *BSD User Group
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?57d710000511271223g5203a330l7ea40336fe4b97f0>