Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 26 Feb 2003 15:25:16 -0800
From:      Darryl Okahata <darrylo@soco.agilent.com>
To:        hartzell@kestrel.alerce.com (George Hartzell)
Cc:        Andrew Boothman <A.J.Boothman@sms.ed.ac.uk>, Matt Smith <matt@forsetti.com>, Lucas Holt <luke@foolishgames.com>, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: "NTLDR missing" after 5-RELEASE install 
Message-ID:  <200302262325.PAA11580@mina.soco.agilent.com>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:07:42 PST." <15965.7822.181074.204822@rosebud.alerce.com> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hartzell@kestrel.alerce.com (George Hartzell) wrote:

> Only differences are which partition we mark active and what boot
> loader lives there.

     True, but that's the key point: "... and what boot loader lives
there."  There are times when not touching the boot loader is desirable.
While GRUB, booteasy, and others are quite perfectly usable for many
people, some of us may be better off with an untouched MBR.

-- 
	Darryl Okahata
	darrylo@soco.agilent.com

DISCLAIMER: this message is the author's personal opinion and does not
constitute the support, opinion, or policy of Agilent Technologies, or
of the little green men that have been following him all day.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200302262325.PAA11580>