Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 23:44:22 +0200 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> To: Craig Boston <cb@severious.net> Cc: Darren Reed <darrenr@freebsd.org>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org> Subject: Re: panic: kmem_malloc(131072): kmem_map too small (AMD64) Message-ID: <46FD75B6.7050709@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20070928133452.GA52277@nowhere> References: <20070928133452.GA52277@nowhere>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Craig Boston wrote: > On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 09:28:36AM -0600, Scott Long wrote: >> You're all missing the point, I hate to say. What happened is that a >> change was made recently to more accurately account for allocated >> memory. Now people are getting kmem_map_too_small panics that weren't >> getting them before. So while the accounting is now more accurate, >> the outcome is actually harmful. That needs to be fixed before the >> release. > > Agreed. A month ago I had zfs running perfectly on many different i386 > machines (albeit with some tweaking to kernel parameters). With a > week-old current, it always panics sooner or later now, no matter how > low I set the ARC cache size or maxvnodes or how much I pump into > kmem_size. > > Now kmem_map panics are being reported on amd64, which was pretty much > unheard of before. FYI, no :) Kris
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46FD75B6.7050709>