Date: Wed, 28 Jan 2009 08:55:37 -0500 From: Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r187805 - head/lib/libc/stdio Message-ID: <20090128085537.2d6c9c34.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <873af38tln.fsf@kobe.laptop> References: <200901280111.n0S1BL7n003092@svn.freebsd.org> <873af38tln.fsf@kobe.laptop>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 15:09:56 +0200 Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:11:21 +0000 (UTC), Tom Rhodes <trhodes@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > Author: trhodes > > Date: Wed Jan 28 01:11:20 2009 > > New Revision: 187805 > > URL: http://svn.freebsd.org/changeset/base/187805 > > > > Log: > > Remove comment about clearerr() being the only method of clearing > > the EOF indicator, fseek() may also be used for this. > > > > Bump document date. > > I don't like this, sorry... Having a pointer to clearerr() is nice. > Removing it *deletes* useful information, but we should add _more_ of > it. > > How about this instead? > > The end-of-file indicator may be cleared by explicitly calling > .Fn clearerr , > or as a side-effect of other operations, i.e.\& > .Fn fseek . I think 'side-effect" is wrong here - it may not be a "side effect" at all, but, on purpose. :) Sorry, I have no other suggestions right now. -- Tom Rhodes
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090128085537.2d6c9c34.trhodes>