Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 23:36:08 +0700 (NSS) From: Max Khon <fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru> To: Steve Lumos <slumos@nevada.edu> Cc: freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: is "stable" "stable"? Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0107232334210.72827-100000@iclub.nsu.ru> In-Reply-To: <200107231630.AHQ09490@100m.mpr200-2.esr.lvcm.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
hi, there! On Mon, 23 Jul 2001, Steve Lumos wrote: > I'm not whining about -STABLE, but then again I didn't lose. However, > I think the current attitude toward people who end up losing after > basically being led to -STABLE by the documentation is bad. It might > be a good idea to add "NOTE: Since this documentation may be out of > date with respect to -STABLE, you should never consider tracking it > until you have read freebsd-stable for a couple of weeks." this happened because RELENG_4_3 is quite new idea (it is actually the first -RELEASE branch) and seems that handbook is really out of sync with real world /fjoe To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0107232334210.72827-100000>