Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2005 21:54:28 +0300 From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@FreeBSD.org> To: Daniel Eriksson <daniel_k_eriksson@telia.com> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: unionfs 5.4 Message-ID: <42348C64.1090104@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA0VcX9IoJqUaXPS8MjT1PdsKAAAAQAAAAi5qNjo%2BxikCLVzjOUfhCzwEAAAAA@telia.com> References: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAA0VcX9IoJqUaXPS8MjT1PdsKAAAAQAAAAi5qNjo%2BxikCLVzjOUfhCzwEAAAAA@telia.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daniel Eriksson wrote: > Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > > >>just ffs: 1:47 min >>nullfs: 1:43 min (oops!:) >>nullfs in jail: 12:12 min > > > I've got ~350 nullfs mounts on one of my servers, and I've never noticed it > being slower than plain ffs. I'm not using it in a jail however, maybe > that's why I've never experienced any slowdown with nullfs. The same with my tests. Have you noticed? -- Sem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42348C64.1090104>