Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2012 04:48:52 -0800 From: Mehmet Erol Sanliturk <m.e.sanliturk@gmail.com> To: Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD needs Git to ensure repo integrity [was: 2012 incident] Message-ID: <CAOgwaMvUriCjg%2Bq28cx3H0a7swbYtcziWeXwJ=LOGwKhvjuGYw@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <k8d914$ssl$1@ger.gmane.org> References: <CAD2Ti29UoFcHendR8CcdQ4FPNW1HH0O47B1i3JW00Lke2m2POg@mail.gmail.com> <20121117221143.41c29ba2@nonamehost> <op.wnxq9eo0g7njmm@michael-think> <CADLo838oG26KmfHJ%2BtLh82GoJzzRtfqy69%2BNny1_DC8F8X4POQ@mail.gmail.com> <k8d914$ssl$1@ger.gmane.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 4:34 AM, Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> wrote: > On 17/11/2012 22:48, Chris Rees wrote: > > > (and is GPL btw) > > Since we're discussing it, Mercurial is BSDL-ed, and apparently has > proper crypto signing using GPG: > > > http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/FAQ#FAQ.2FTechnicalDetails.How_do_Mercurial_hashes_get_calculated.3F > > > http://selenic.com/repo/hg/file/fd903f89e42b http://selenic.com/repo/hg/file/fd903f89e42b/COPYING " GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE <http://selenic.com/repo/hg/file/fd903f89e42b/COPYING#l2>Version 2, June 1991 <http://selenic.com/repo/hg/file/fd903f89e42b/COPYING#l3>; " In their repository , it is GPL v2 . Is there any other place which specifies its license as BSDL ? Thank you very much . Mehmet Erol Sanliturk
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAOgwaMvUriCjg%2Bq28cx3H0a7swbYtcziWeXwJ=LOGwKhvjuGYw>