Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 18 Jul 2011 16:31:05 -0500
From:      Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com>
To:        Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk>
Cc:        linimon@freebsd.org, sparc64@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: the state of ports on sparc64
Message-ID:  <20110718213105.GC31033@lonesome.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110718130344.GA72546@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
References:  <20110716060713.GA25856@lonesome.com> <20110718130344.GA72546@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 02:03:44PM +0100, Anton Shterenlikht wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 01:07:13AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> 
> > print/teTeX-texmf		freebsd-doc		 298	missing file on install
> 
> I can install/build package for this port on sparc64 fine.

Well, a re-run seems to have made it build.  I am investigating.

> Looking at
> 
> http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=print&portname=teTeX-texmf
> 
> it seems the install error is issued
> only when using clang. Is that correct?

Nope.  If it's calling it "clang" that is a false positive from the
error classifier.

I have not yet tried a ports build with clang on sparc.  Since many ports
still do not build on i386 with clang, there's not much point yet.

mcl



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110718213105.GC31033>