Date: Thu, 6 Jul 2000 23:14:56 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Bill Fumerola <billf@chimesnet.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/kern imgact_elf.c src/sys/sys imgact_elf.h src/sys/i386/linux linux_sysvec.c Message-ID: <20000706231455.D47491@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <20000706192818.W4034@jade.chc-chimes.com>; from billf@chimesnet.com on Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 07:28:18PM -0400 References: <200007062226.PAA87109@freefall.freebsd.org> <20000706192818.W4034@jade.chc-chimes.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 07:28:18PM -0400, Bill Fumerola wrote: > On Thu, Jul 06, 2000 at 03:26:41PM -0700, David E. O'Brien wrote: > > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4) > > sys/kern imgact_elf.c > > sys/sys imgact_elf.h > > sys/i386/linux linux_sysvec.c > > Log: > > MFC: Change our ELF binary branding to match the SCO (as USL) method in > > the latest SVR4 ELF spec. > > Are people going to have to do the brandelf magic to all their binaries > like we had to do in -current.. or is this a different change? Nope. I re-wrote my changes to imgact_elf.c. If anybody has any *new* problems running Linux binaries, PLEASE let me know. (and provide full error messages) Newly built FreeBSD binaries and those branded with brandelf(1) will get the new-style branding. But we can identify the old branding as well as on 3.x systems now. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org) To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20000706231455.D47491>