Date: Wed, 12 Aug 1998 11:29:15 +0200 From: Marius Bendiksen <Marius.Bendiksen@scancall.no> To: andrew@squiz.co.nz Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: UDP port 31337 Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19980812112915.0092ead0@mail.scancall.no> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980812162024.16956J-100000@aniwa.sky> References: <004101bdc599$2c6f9420$4100a8c0@periscope.digital-canvas.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Or it's traceroute of course. Not very likely? Wouldn't a traceroute connect to several ports that high up? >How hard would it be to arrange for a reply to be sent that would cause a >back orifice client to send more and distinguish itself from a traceroute? I got a potentially interesting idea; Imagine a backorificed running on Unix machines, pretending to be a 'legitimate' Back Orifice installation, fully configurable, etc... ? :) --- Marius Bendiksen, IT-Trainee, ScanCall AS To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.5.32.19980812112915.0092ead0>