Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Nov 2003 13:27:42 -0500
From:      Bill Moran <wmoran@potentialtech.com>
To:        Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org>
Cc:        freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: The future of X?
Message-ID:  <3FB27B9E.2000902@potentialtech.com>
In-Reply-To: <20031112184850.0f752d52.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org>
References:  <20031112184850.0f752d52.flynn@energyhq.es.eu.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Miguel Mendez wrote:
> Several places have commented on the subject already, it's currently on
> /. as well. The relevant link:
> http://freedesktop.org/~keithp/screenshots/
> 
> So, I'm wondering, what do you guys think about the dropshadow and
> transparent windows thing Mr. Packard and friends are working on? Could
> it help on the adoption of *ix on the desktop? I personally don't mind
> some eye candy now and then, so, as long as it can be turned off, it
> looks good in my book. I've read some comments saying that some people
> get a better undestanding of the desktop if the windows cast a shadow.
> On the negative side, I don't think having 3 forks is that good
> (XFree86, Xouvert and this stuff). FWIW, the screenshots sure are pretty :)

Isn't there another project trying to put together a replacement for X?
I thought it was called "Berlin", but I can't find it anywhere on the net,
so I can't be sure.

-- 
Bill Moran
Potential Technologies
http://www.potentialtech.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FB27B9E.2000902>