Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:29:39 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: "Ivan Voras" <ivoras@gmail.com> Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Subject: Re: svn commit: r185356 - head/sys/dev/ixgbe Message-ID: <8663m94g30.fsf@ds4.des.no> In-Reply-To: <9bbcef730811270220h1a7f812k2ba340737132ff82@mail.gmail.com> (Ivan Voras's message of "Thu, 27 Nov 2008 11:20:39 %2B0100") References: <200811270219.mAR2Ji2M073024@svn.freebsd.org> <20081126213204.14db9a63@kan.dnsalias.net> <20081127.000621.1413927847.imp@bsdimp.com> <9bbcef730811270220h1a7f812k2ba340737132ff82@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
"Ivan Voras" <ivoras@gmail.com> writes: > And at least the newer GEOM code also uses c99 variable declarations > (not only for initializers - they were c99 from the start). I'm curious about what you mean with "c99 variable declarations". If you are referring to loop variable declarations, I can only find two cases, both in g_linux_lvm.c. Other than that and mixing declarations with statements (which style(9) explicitly forbids), there is no difference between c89 to c99 as far as variable declarations are concerned. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=C3=B8rgrav - des@des.no
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?8663m94g30.fsf>