Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 10 Jan 2014 23:51:34 -0800
From:      Kevin Oberman <rkoberman@gmail.com>
To:        Thomas Mueller <mueller6724@bellsouth.net>
Cc:        Glen Barber <gjb@freebsd.org>, "freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Stable" <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD 10.0-RC5 Now Available
Message-ID:  <CAN6yY1vnsiuXjcKgQMCbeSCCx2LZRC2Z667Mkb74v5FyqDOpJA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <527364.37701.bm@smtp117.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>
References:  <20140109161818.GK64543@glenbarber.us> <20140110114102.692560fe@X220.alogt.com> <20140110064658.GM64543@glenbarber.us> <294911.64845.bm@smtp114.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com> <20140110131910.GP64543@glenbarber.us> <527364.37701.bm@smtp117.sbc.mail.ne1.yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Thomas Mueller
<mueller6724@bellsouth.net>wrote:

> > > Does this need to rebuild all ports apply even if one has not yet
> built X?
>
> > ABI changed, so to be safe, yes.
>
> > Glen
>
> There ought to be an advisory in $PORTSDIR/UPDATING.
>
> But I still consider myself advised, after I update FreeBSD
> 10.0-prerelease installations.
>
> I guess this does not yet apply to 11-HEAD?
>
> Tom
>

As already reported in another thread, most ports will be fine, but hal and
tmux need rebuilding.I have about 1200 ports installed and have only found
those to this point. Almost certainly others do, as well, though they won't
be common, but rebuilding all ports is safest. (dbus does not seem to
require a rebuild).
-- 
R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer, Retired
E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAN6yY1vnsiuXjcKgQMCbeSCCx2LZRC2Z667Mkb74v5FyqDOpJA>