Date: Mon, 7 Feb 2005 20:17:10 +0100 From: Anthony Atkielski <atkielski.anthony@wanadoo.fr> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: favor Message-ID: <1916926078.20050207201710@wanadoo.fr> In-Reply-To: <d9175cad05020709074666ca06@mail.gmail.com> References: <200502061420.24415.krinklyfig@spymac.com> <LOBBIFDAGNMAMLGJJCKNOEEKFAAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> <d9175cad05020703066c9e02a2@mail.gmail.com> <1165136567.20050207171314@wanadoo.fr> <d9175cad05020708306ed8685a@mail.gmail.com> <15310210442.20050207175034@wanadoo.fr> <d9175cad05020709074666ca06@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Eric Kjeldergaard writes: EK> Perhaps they take a greater risk, or perhaps things are simpler than EK> that. Perhaps, upon submitting something according to the simple EK> instructions with intent for it to be published, it gets published EK> as the general populous would expect...Often things are not EK> complicated. You forget the most likely option of all: For years, cyberspace was dominated by geeks, and ignored by lawyers and the general public. Now, with the general public and the lawyers watching cyberspace very closely indeed, it will no longer be possible for the geeks to get away with doing whatever they want, for better or for worse. Greater regulation and legal hassles are the trend for the future. Pretending it isn't happening will only leave one all the more vulnerable to it as it arrives. -- Anthony
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?1916926078.20050207201710>