Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 21:24:13 -0500 From: Jon Noack <noackjr@alumni.rice.edu> To: Mikhail Teterin <mi@corbulon.video-collage.com> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: a scheduling question Message-ID: <40AD684D.9020200@alumni.rice.edu> In-Reply-To: <200405200334.i4K3YlGU027751@corbulon.video-collage.com> References: <200405200334.i4K3YlGU027751@corbulon.video-collage.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/19/04 22:34, Mikhail Teterin wrote: > Here is a top's snapshot from a dual CPU machine. Two lame encoders > compete for the first CPU, while the total idle time is 35.6%. Why is > that? Because they are nice? Is niceness really supposed to allow for > wasted CPU? Thanks! I noticed the cdparanoi[a] processes. What is/are the exact command(s) you are doing? If you are encoding on-the-fly, are you sure the lame processes are not being limited by the ripping rate? It would be best if you could come up with a test case for us to see if we can reproduce your problem. Jon Noack
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40AD684D.9020200>