Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2005 10:10:31 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf kern.post.mk Message-ID: <20050913071031.GE37280@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <20050912010034.GA77819@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <20050911002229.51F4916A471@hub.freebsd.org> <432382BC.5080105@root.org> <20050911023622.GA51877@dragon.NUXI.org> <4324A665.3070405@root.org> <20050912010034.GA77819@dragon.NUXI.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] Hi, On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 06:00:34PM -0700, David O'Brien wrote: > On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 02:49:25PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote: > > David O'Brien wrote: > > >I was going to just install kernel.sym instead of a kernel with symbols, > > >but kgdb's usage doesn't claim to support '-s' as the previous kgdb did. > > > > kernel.sym would be better since it wouldn't have the duplication that > > kernel and kernel.debug have. > > Duplication in RELENG_* or in HEAD? > > > Alternately, we can make loader(8) skip > > symbol sections when booting and just install kernel.debug > > That *is* what my change does - except it calls it "kernel" so there > aren't loading issues. > What was wrong with using installkernel.debug or "make installkernel -DINSTALL_DEBUG" (the latter is useful when you don't know if your kernel was compiled with debug or not)? IOW, why enforce it? Cheers, -- Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFDJntnqRfpzJluFF4RAnKgAJ9RS18od6K2iyxxZVI4QZNVKvdoagCdEsZy W51GeAx5r+6pt4zlsPYEM9c= =pDLX -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050913071031.GE37280>