Date: Sat, 22 Oct 2011 23:07:06 +0400 From: Boris Samorodov <bsam@passap.ru> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sys/conf/newvers.sh vs. subversion-1.7 Message-ID: <4EA3145A.6020703@passap.ru> In-Reply-To: <4EA30772.8090709@FreeBSD.org> References: <20111020114844.GK59810@albert.catwhisker.org> <20111020122121.GL59810@albert.catwhisker.org> <201110211636.05917.jhb@freebsd.org> <20111021211221.GV59810@albert.catwhisker.org> <CAG=rPVfD8EZYpD_SQES2%2B9uUeqGOaAhW3asJbVeGKeV3er2ZKw@mail.gmail.com> <4EA21842.5000808@FreeBSD.org> <CAG=rPVeBQq5srTTjHDg-9Yc7R%2B5%2Buhm4BgzvhxEJ4KyN9ef%2B7w@mail.gmail.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1110220801140.38610@toaster.local> <4EA30772.8090709@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
22.10.2011 22:12, Doug Barton пишет:
> On 10/22/2011 08:29, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> $(svn info | awk '/^Revision:/ {print $2}')
>
> 2 subshells and a pipe for this, vs. only 1 subshell for just running
> svnversion.
>
> Anyone else want to propose a more complex solution when a simple and
> more effective one already exists? :)
I'm not an exert here, so I'm not sure which one and why did you call
"simple and more effective":
-----
% uname -a
FreeBSD bsam.tel.ru 9.0-BETA2 FreeBSD 9.0-BETA2 #32 r225746: Sat Sep 24
17:00:42 MSK 2011 bsam@bsam.tel.ru:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/BB i386
% time svnversion /usr/src
226160
svnversion /usr/src 8,80s user 7,12s system 16% cpu 1:34,16 total
% time (svn info /usr/src | awk '/^Revision:/ {print $2}')
226160
( svn info /usr/src | awk '/^Revision:/ {print $2}'; ) 0,00s user 0,00s
system 16% cpu 0,013 total
-----
--
WBR, Boris Samorodov (bsam)
FreeBSD Committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4EA3145A.6020703>