Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2010 13:46:36 -0400 From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@freebsd.org> To: Renato Botelho <garga@freebsd.org> Cc: cvs-ports@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org, Matthias Andree <mandree@freebsd.org>, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/net-im/empathy Makefile ports/net-im/telepathy-mission-control Makefile Message-ID: <4BD1DCFC.1@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20100423171805.GA2857@bluepex.com> References: <201004231327.o3NDRh1F010904@repoman.freebsd.org> <4BD1D19D.50906@freebsd.org> <20100423171805.GA2857@bluepex.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/23/10 1:18 PM, Renato Botelho wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:58:05PM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >> On 4/23/10 9:27 AM, Matthias Andree wrote: >>> mandree 2010-04-23 13:27:43 UTC >>> >>> FreeBSD ports repository >>> >>> Modified files: >>> net-im/empathy Makefile >>> net-im/telepathy-mission-control Makefile >>> Log: >>> MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE for empathy and telepathy-m-c >>> >>> PR: ports/145441 >>> PR: ports/145443 >>> Approved by: maintainer timeout (17 days) >>> Approved by: garga (mentor) > >> We actually have a huge plan underway to commit GNOME 2.30. This was >> not being ignored, and the plan is quite public. Can you please revert >> this pending that commit? Thanks. > > If you don't want the PR is touched after maintainer timeout, you should > change its status to analyzed at least. It's makes things much clear for > other committers. I understand, and usually we do. However, things have been hectic getting GNOME 2.30 tested along with X.org, etc. Given the number of threads about major upcoming changes, I would think that these kind of things would be taken into consideration before such commits. Joe -- Joe Marcus Clarke FreeBSD GNOME Team :: gnome@FreeBSD.org FreeNode / #freebsd-gnome http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4BD1DCFC.1>