Date: Thu, 6 Mar 2014 19:36:10 -0500 From: Glen Barber <gjb@FreeBSD.org> To: Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org> Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" <freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: TMPFS in kernels Message-ID: <20140307003610.GE87036@glenbarber.us> In-Reply-To: <1394152175.1149.360.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> References: <5314016B.1000107@ceetonetechnology.com> <20140303061136.GB85204@zibbi.meraka.csir.co.za> <CAHNYxxPvRwmSDw8M9znFi1QsDq%2BR=Ash7AODWTct4Q_TBdOCVQ@mail.gmail.com> <C1297CD6-C313-4516-BA51-71C427C45B79@bsdimp.com> <CAHNYxxOAcjiU0C6of9wBeHyXiCCgdJWt2Y8BpV%2BDyyD=fxdG2g@mail.gmail.com> <1394148799.1149.354.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <53190F52.7030605@ceetonetechnology.com> <1394151627.1149.357.camel@revolution.hippie.lan> <CA1F2561-412A-466A-BF5B-1FBE5EDEE451@bsdimp.com> <1394152175.1149.360.camel@revolution.hippie.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--8M+gQFKLhTGBxzRu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 05:29:35PM -0700, Ian Lepore wrote: > On Thu, 2014-03-06 at 17:25 -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > > On Mar 6, 2014, at 5:20 PM, Ian Lepore <ian@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > >=20 > [...] > > > Yeah, for the kernel side of it, I'm just adding TMPFS to > > > arm/conf/DEFAULTS since the concensus seems to be that we want it in = all > > > kernels. I'm waiting for a universe-kernels build to finish and if i= t's > > > clean I'll commit that tonight. > >=20 > > DEFAULTS was never intended for something like this.. Only for things t= hat > > must be mandatory or very nearly mandatory for the system to operate. W= hile > > useful, this isn=E2=80=99t mandatory by any stretch of the imagination.= I strongly object > > to putting it there, so please don=E2=80=99t commit it to DEFAULTS. >=20 >=20 > Ooops, your email and the commit passed each other on the wires. >=20 > But... really? An option we want in every kernel we should paste into > 70+ files instead of into the one file that they all include? >=20 Why not include it by default, and exclude it where not needed/wanted? Glen --8M+gQFKLhTGBxzRu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (FreeBSD) iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJTGRR6AAoJELls3eqvi17QQmwQAL/KOU7PyMFKNiW3L27Ft5cB j187delfGtPKgb070cmQqB/At2jOhHF6yJPVWimHN7Qh2SISe/1INEpEZJBk7HH3 QjLW0v/RNMObTvYye6aPEJujrGfZGPwesxyBiEHzfZbC9FNAzoGu9IsKN+hrUsy2 tLhfAoRgud0OuRA3tpk+sv/Zyzhk6nbWkIfIJQGs1X7vaIVbAbysrMctlB+0V4sU r4cnFxooZHDRmeEWECa7kLNImzuYMTL0b2sihk+8Jo1K9+y+7D70/WpOhR+ruFkZ 23zINdBamMsVbXYqkMjloV4fQ1DZkCZazJrUuiVnE++xsaDLxP182gwM9Q76jJg0 vYlKexbUuglY/TF8Fjbq+p4G79R7BC2KYU2SjwUiO3T3A5Wmx+rqXcXszv09hPMj MEW4lNDBGU236CP/sTdix9I4Xeeo9fbFSNVYbcmB7QK8Ru+kgi26s/0VhyzNtQkH Sqvo4V5igC+B32E1Inhx5/TafX7Ui/DH6EET52fKDOYhCpkTxJ1i+fev2YifbyLa sDjC9oMqCQqhstMb9xYWXfiI8y1IWy/fsy/4ociLPbzCV0Bxd0QSpAXCHmOWnNUT ErAbvJozhD3NO5eXdfOKm7QjbT1iSSBbf9ijIpDhTsg1zjW0jXyzBtbkhTpOjQC1 TjyuogZ9c9412pKfOplo =EnjV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --8M+gQFKLhTGBxzRu--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140307003610.GE87036>