Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2002 09:25:48 +0300 From: Vitaly Markitantov <vm@dics.com.ua> To: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: smbfs broken? Message-ID: <20021024062548.GA16002@iron.del.local> In-Reply-To: <3DB6EB16.2025AAE3@mindspring.com> References: <3DB664D0.FE0B8018@mindspring.com> <XFMail.20021023105107.jhb@FreeBSD.org> <20021023152144.GA10351@iron.del.local> <20021023160014.GM661@starjuice.net> <3DB6EB16.2025AAE3@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Oct 23, 2002 at 11:31:50AM -0700, Terry Lambert wrote:
> AHA!
>
> The reason an FFS write resulted in an SMBFS read is that
> you had mmap()'ed an SMBFS file, and then wrote a mapped
> but-not-in-core page to the target FFS file.
>
> Knowing that the code involved is in the paging path of the
> SMBFS code is important.
>
> What happens if you:
>
> dd if=/smb/urchin/pub/bytes/8145 of=8145
>
> ? I expect that it works, no problem.
Yes, it works fine in both direction - copy from and to SMBFS.
cp still not works correctly (nor reads nor writes to SMBFS)
--
Vitaly Markitantov mailto: vm@dics.com.ua
icq: 117438950 phone: (062)332-23-90
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20021024062548.GA16002>