Date: Thu, 1 Apr 2004 09:38:15 -0600 From: "Jacques A. Vidrine" <nectar@FreeBSD.org> To: Daniel Eischen <eischen@vigrid.com> Cc: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Subject: Re: nss_ldap broken Message-ID: <20040401153815.GD60392@madman.celabo.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.10.10404011008290.25682-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com> References: <20040401143627.GA60225@madman.celabo.org> <Pine.GSO.4.10.10404011008290.25682-100000@pcnet5.pcnet.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Apr 01, 2004 at 10:16:25AM -0500, Daniel Eischen wrote: > I think the best way is to avoid having shared libraries needlessly linked to > a threads library. If we can guarantee that -pthread would give that behavior ``forever'', then great. I guess we've come full circle (``-pthread good'' ``-pthread bad, don't use it'' ``-pthread good''). :-) Then how does one pick an alternate threading library? Say `libmap' and I'll choke. :-) I seem to recall that one of the GCC guys made a detailed proposal for extending the syntax of `-pthread' to handle alternate threading libraries, but I can't find that posting right now. Cheers, -- Jacques Vidrine / nectar@celabo.org / jvidrine@verio.net / nectar@freebsd.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040401153815.GD60392>