Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 16 May 1997 10:17:06 -0500 (EST)
From:      "Pedro F. Giffuni" <pgiffuni@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>
To:        Ben Black <black@zen.cypher.net>
Cc:        "David S. Miller" <davem@jenolan.rutgers.edu>, thorpej@nas.nasa.gov, rminnich@sarnoff.com, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Cluster Computing in BSD
Message-ID:  <Pine.A41.3.95.970516101453.17134F-100000@fps.biblos.unal.edu.co>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.91.970516012216.15211F-100000@zen.cypher.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 16 May 1997, Ben Black wrote:

> i think the real reason for the 6 CPU limit has been suggested.  
> commercial release.  note the lack of black helicopters for that explanation.
> 
> b3n
> 
Funds for MOSIX came from the Israeli Ministry of Defense, and the
Ministry of Science (and Energy?)...I think there are some black
helicopters over there.

	Pedro.


> On Fri, 16 May 1997, David S. Miller wrote:
> 
> >    Date: Fri, 16 May 1997 00:40:13 -0400 (EDT)
> >    From: Ben Black <black@zen.cypher.net>
> > 
> >    the current RC5 distributed cracking effort shows quite clearly
> >    that something as advanced as MOSIX is not required.  if his logic
> >    is that bad guys will use MOSIX to crack encryption brute force
> >    then he is fooling himself.
> > 
> > And besides, as far as MO6 goes, all I have to say is that adb is your
> > friend...
> > 
> 




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.A41.3.95.970516101453.17134F-100000>