Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2003 23:08:27 +0100 From: Erik Trulsson <ertr1013@student.uu.se> To: Brad Laue <brad@brad-x.com> Cc: "Kirk R. Wythers" <kwythers@umn.edu>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: upgrading from STABLE to 5.0 Message-ID: <20030120220827.GA2533@falcon.midgard.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <3E2C6B7C.6070205@brad-x.com> References: <1043080805.29319.14.camel@x74-47.forestry.umn.edu> <3E2C6B7C.6070205@brad-x.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 20, 2003 at 04:34:52PM -0500, Brad Laue wrote: > Kirk R. Wythers wrote: > > >1) I see a line in the UPDATING file that says: > >make buildkernel KERNCONF=YOUR_KERNEL_HERE > > A question arises based on this line. > > This is instructed to be run after 'make buildworld', but not after make > installworld. Is there a drawback to building the kernel in this way, > considering it will be built with GCC 2.95.4 and not 3.2.1? Is > rebuilding the kernel again after installworld a recommended practice? Doing a 'make buildkernel' directly after a 'make buildworld' should build the kernel using the compiler just built with the buildworld. So there should be no need to rebuild the kernel again. -- <Insert your favourite quote here.> Erik Trulsson ertr1013@student.uu.se To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030120220827.GA2533>