Date: Tue, 6 May 2003 00:45:40 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.ORG>, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/devel/boaconstructor Makefile pkg-plist Message-ID: <20030506074540.GF40717@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20030506074210.GK25227@vectors.cx> References: <200305060733.h467XYtV083840@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030506074210.GK25227@vectors.cx>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Tue, May 06, 2003 at 12:42:10AM -0700, Adam Weinberger wrote: > >> (05.06.2003 @ 0033 PST): Adam Weinberger said, in 0.3K: << > > adamw 2003/05/06 00:33:34 PDT > > > > FreeBSD ports repository > > > > Modified files: > > devel/boaconstructor Makefile pkg-plist > > Log: > > Fix plist. > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.7 +0 -2 ports/devel/boaconstructor/Makefile > > 1.4 +0 -1 ports/devel/boaconstructor/pkg-plist > > > >> end of "cvs commit: ports/devel/boaconstructor Makefile pkg-plist" from Adam Weinberger << > > Should this get a PORTREVISION bump? I don't think so..if the port had missing pkg-plist entries, so it would leave behind stale files when deinstalled, then it might be worthwhile bumping PORTREVISION. Typically we're pretty forgetful about that though. Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+t2gkWry0BWjoQKURAljAAJ98mxXi75iTL5t6fjO2/Vl3ja6//ACggdM1 7q61S96FMXTx1RXrzQOfqkA= =DnYG -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030506074540.GF40717>