Date: Fri, 07 Oct 2011 18:06:21 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Beat Gaetzi <beat@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/libxul Makefile distinfo Message-ID: <4E8FA20D.7000600@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <201110072059.p97KxBh5019707@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <201110072059.p97KxBh5019707@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 10/07/2011 13:59, Beat Gaetzi wrote: > beat 2011-10-07 20:59:11 UTC > > FreeBSD ports repository > > Modified files: > www/libxul Makefile distinfo > Log: > - Update to 1.9.2.23 > - Use Firefox source tarball to build libxul as upstrem no longer provides > xulrunner tarballs for the 1.9.2 branch. I'm excited to see an update to this vulnerable port, but I'm wondering why require the 3.6.23 version instead of the latest version which most users would have on their system already? Doug > Discussed with: flo@ at EuroBSDCon DevSummit > > Revision Changes Path > 1.31 +3 -4 ports/www/libxul/Makefile > 1.17 +2 -2 ports/www/libxul/distinfo > > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/www/libxul/Makefile.diff?&r1=1.30&r2=1.31&f=h > http://www.FreeBSD.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/www/libxul/distinfo.diff?&r1=1.16&r2=1.17&f=h > -- Nothin' ever doesn't change, but nothin' changes much. -- OK Go Breadth of IT experience, and depth of knowledge in the DNS. Yours for the right price. :) http://SupersetSolutions.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4E8FA20D.7000600>