Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 07:38:20 +0000 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: "Vlad GALU" <dudu@dudu.ro> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: fdescfs/devfs Message-ID: <75690.1156318700@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 23 Aug 2006 09:29:27 %2B0300." <ad79ad6b0608222329j5d43dae9h9e1408926bd9cf6c@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <ad79ad6b0608222329j5d43dae9h9e1408926bd9cf6c@mail.gmail.com>, "Vlad
GALU" writes:
> Is it just a wrong impression on my side, or devfs really
>supersedes fdescfs ? I've been using /dev/fd/* for a while having the
>impression I had fdescfs mounted on /dev/fd, and I hadn't. I didn't
>see any differences whatsoever in terms of usage.
It's not really devfs, it's kern_descrip.c and it only implements
/dev/fd[0-2] and the /dev/std{in,out,err} aliases.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?75690.1156318700>