Date: Sun, 19 Nov 1995 09:21:25 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@rocky.sri.MT.net> To: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> Cc: chuckr@glue.umd.edu (Chuck Robey), FreeBSD-chat@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Gcc-2.7.1 Message-ID: <199511191621.JAA16061@rocky.sri.MT.net> In-Reply-To: <199511191333.OAA01301@keltia.freenix.fr> References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951118215139.9575A-100000@mocha.eng.umd.edu> <199511191333.OAA01301@keltia.freenix.fr>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[ 2.7.1 bug-fixes ]
> I don't recall either but I know that C++ was broken (try running groff
> compiled with 2.7.0 !).
Nope. Groff is broken with regards to newer c++ releases because it
relies on an older revision of the standard. You can compile groff by
telling it to use the older standard with a flag.
It has to do with:
{
for (int i=0; i++; i < 10)
printf("%d ", i);
printf("%d\n", i);
In the older standard, 'i' was in scope in the final printf, but the
newer standard says that 'i' is only in scope within the for loop.
Nate
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199511191621.JAA16061>