Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 17:45:57 -0700 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Joseph Davida <jd10008@yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Linux Emulation on FreeBSD 4.8 Message-ID: <20030820004557.GA82579@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20030819233917.28548.qmail@web41405.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20030819233917.28548.qmail@web41405.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 04:39:17PM -0700, Joseph Davida wrote: > Are these syscalls not implemented in Linux kernel > 2.4.x? Surely, but Linux != FreeBSD. They're not present in older Linux kernels, so glibc will fall back to other syscalls if they are not present, and the binary continues to operate normally. Kris --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE/QsTFWry0BWjoQKURAuYqAKDY25THBWSYBv7v8yt5fCpEkLKS9wCeOSak xGet7JBA9sJOpU2RrZMMoyg= =CmiY -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --r5Pyd7+fXNt84Ff3--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030820004557.GA82579>