Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 11:59:45 -0500 From: Dennis <dennis@etinc.com> To: Harold Gutch <logix@foobar.franken.de>, Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Cobalt blames linux for their security problems! Message-ID: <199902281652.LAA00271@etinc.com> In-Reply-To: <19990228132208.A18501@foobar.franken.de> References: <199902271927.OAA26965@etinc.com> <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902270211230.4716-100000@ns1.seidata.com> <Pine.BSF.3.95.990226192359.12223W-100000@current1.whistle.com> <Pine.BSF.4.05.9902270211230.4716-100000@ns1.seidata.com> <19990227211853.N7279@lemis.com> <199902271927.OAA26965@etinc.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 01:22 PM 2/28/99 +0100, Harold Gutch wrote: >On Sat, Feb 27, 1999 at 02:36:06PM -0500, Dennis wrote: >> >>> There's a good idea.. use a free OS and then blame it for your problems.. >> >They could just as well have run FreeBSD. The issue here is that they >> >(or somebody else) are blaming the OS for their own mistakes. >> >> One problem with cobalt is that they arent running the latest kernels which >> fix >> the problem....it seems that THAT is their fault. >> >The latest Linux-kernels don't allow the shells to create their >history-files ? Or do the latest kernels prevent httpds from >reading from users' homedirectories ? > >I somehow fail to see what the kernel should have to do with the >"Cobalt-bug". I was referring to the security problems associated with the 2.0.33 kernel which the cobalt was running....again I accept my punishment for not finding the beginning of the thread. :-) Dennis To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199902281652.LAA00271>