Date: Fri, 18 Oct 1996 21:02:27 -0600 (MDT) From: Softweyr LLC <softweyr@xmission.com> To: narvi@haldjas.folklore.ee (Narvi) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD-stable new release Message-ID: <199610190302.VAA29102@xmission.xmission.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.91.961017120657.17620D-100000@haldjas.folklore.ee> from "Narvi" at Oct 17, 96 12:28:26 pm
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> For all those who do not read -hackers - there is another users vs.
> developers flamewar, on part of it being the new releases, among others
> the release of 2.1.6/7 - the number doesn't matter, it is the same
> thing. Now are there any *sane* ideas as for what *new* things should
> make it to 2.1.6? Are the new ports that can be brought over to be
> bgrought over, do we want tcl-7.5 included in the system as there is in
> -current, do we want some other "upgrades" be present (I personaly use
> DES code from -current for newer SSLeay port).
I've noticed that IIJPPP is not as stable in 2.1.5-R as could be hoped.
Have any improvements been made in this area? I've not seen much on the
-stable list lately; I'd like to be able to sup any changes and get
my system back to the stability I head in May/June.
I'm willing to contribute test time; I'm working from home doing cross
development for a M68K VxWorks system about 20 hours/week right now;
I could really give it a spin.
--
"Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"
Wes Peters Softweyr LLC
http://www.xmission.com/~softweyr softweyr@xmission.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610190302.VAA29102>