Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 09:14:38 -0800 From: Bill Campbell <freebsd@celestial.com> To: Bill Campbell <freebsd@celestial.com>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Outlook With FreeBSD IMAP Message-ID: <20070227171438.GA14341@ayn.mi.celestial.com> In-Reply-To: <20070227150304.H8671@chylonia.3miasto.net> References: <45E25D3A.7070308@chrismaness.com> <20070226124421.X89345@chylonia.3miasto.net> <45E2E578.4080201@ibctech.ca> <45E2F933.5040707@u.washington.edu> <45E38293.6000403@sonicboom.org> <20070227023103.GA31729@ayn.mi.celestial.com> <20070227150304.H8671@chylonia.3miasto.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>>>how usable Outlook is with IMAP. >>>> >>>>The UW uses uw-imap (whatever the latest version is) because they >>>>develop that mailserver. >> >>As you say the U.W. would have a hard time using anything but uw-imap >>(where do you thing the uw in uw-imap comes from :-). > >use dovecot with Maildir. IMHO it's the best for mail service now. at >least for me I haven't looked at dovecot. Does it maintain a group of listeners, similar to apache's, to handle incoming requests as courier-imap does? So far we have had excellent performance with courier-imap at sites with about 10,000 mail clients hitting a single server (most of whom are using the POP interface as these are ISP sites). Bill -- INTERNET: bill@Celestial.COM Bill Campbell; Celestial Software LLC URL: http://www.celestial.com/ PO Box 820; 6641 E. Mercer Way FAX: (206) 232-9186 Mercer Island, WA 98040-0820; (206) 236-1676 Those who profess to favor freedom, and yet depreciate agitation, are men who want rain without thunder and lightning. They want the ocean without the roar of its many waters. -- Frederick Douglass
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20070227171438.GA14341>