Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 19:38:36 +0300 (EEST) From: Petri Helenius <pete@sms.fi> To: Garrett Wollman <wollman@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> Cc: freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: IPv6 sources w/out export restriction Message-ID: <199710141638.TAA22353@silver.sms.fi> In-Reply-To: <199710141559.LAA13260@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> References: <19970924075951.46946@keltia.freenix.fr> <Pine.BSF.3.91.971014134200.23347C-100000@dab.iit.uni-miskolc.hu> <199710141354.QAA21928@silver.sms.fi> <199710141532.LAA13155@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu> <199710141554.SAA22187@silver.sms.fi> <199710141559.LAA13260@khavrinen.lcs.mit.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Garrett Wollman writes: > There's the DARTNET one based on the NRL code (which is radically > restructured every week or so I'm told, making it difficult to keep a > stable code base). There's the one from WIDE in Japan. I've talked > with people who know of others, but I can't be more specific. > > IPv6 right now is a research vehicle. It will not be production > technology for some years. It would be very, very premature to > incorporate any one implementation into our source tree at this time. > I've always thought that in addition of being a wonderful production platform the *BSD platforms are also research vechiles but it seems that the code is missing some modularity Linux has since they have a "beta V6 addon" which fits onto various releases of the OS. Pete
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199710141638.TAA22353>