Date: Fri, 10 May 2013 14:44:33 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> To: bf1783@gmail.com Cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/119546 Message-ID: <518CEBB1.50109@netfence.it> In-Reply-To: <CAGFTUwNH6pb4B0QYw%2BYojwXRa-5FDszXugZ1-OttKZqyjqTT=g@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAGFTUwNH6pb4B0QYw%2BYojwXRa-5FDszXugZ1-OttKZqyjqTT=g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 05/10/13 14:32, b.f. wrote: >> Would I screw too many things if I tried adding: >>> WITH_OPENSSL_BASE=yes > > Yes, because then the additions to the check-depends target in > ports/Mk/bsd.openssl.mk would cause unsandboxed builds of the port on > a live system to fail when security/openssl is installed. Adding > WITH_OPENSSL_BASE to port Makefiles should be avoided for this reason. Thanks for the answer, but I don't quite get this. Do you have any pointer for docs I can study? What's the purpose/usefulness of WITH_OPENSSL_BASE, then? Is there another simple solution? bye & Thanks av. P.S. Not only ssh fails, but Thunderbird too, if I enable nss_ldap.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?518CEBB1.50109>