Date: Mon, 14 May 2001 17:33:26 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Piechota <piechota@argolis.org> To: <freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: nfs mounts / su / yp Message-ID: <20010514172900.Q55013-100000@cithaeron.argolis.org> In-Reply-To: <3B003F3B.906F3802@lmc.ericsson.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 14 May 2001, Antoine Beaupre (LMC) wrote: > > While the idea isn't bad, SMB has enough flaws that I wouldn't use it. > > I wasn't aware of that. Flaws in the implementation or in the design? I > thought samba was pretty well written, but I guess this is compared to > their Windows counterpart. ;) Well, flaws in the default configuration. The LAN Manager Hash (for compatibility) strikes me first. You can crack a *lot* of LM hashes in a few seconds, with nothing more than a network sniffer and L0phtcrack. > Yes, I considered that too. However, it seems the ports collection only > features a AFS client, and no server. Again, correct me if I'm wrong! I think arla will serve AFS on FreeBSD. Coda will for sure (the Coda server is userspace, requires no kernel support). The client is an option in the 4.x series (at least). One thing: a friend of mine was running Coda on Linux, and claims his cell crashed taking all his data with it. I don't know what he did, but I haven't done it yet. :) -- Matt Piechota Finger piechota@emailempire.com for PGP key AOL IM: cithaeron To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010514172900.Q55013-100000>