Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2009 13:50:29 +0400 From: Sergey Vinogradov <boogie@lazybytes.org> To: "Svein Skogen (listmail account)" <svein-listmail@stillbilde.net> Cc: Dag-Erling =?UTF-8?B?U23DuHJncmF2?= <des@des.no>, current@FreeBSD.org, arch@FreeBSD.org, Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> Subject: Re: tmux(1) in base Message-ID: <20090923135029.69a016f8@lazybytes.org> In-Reply-To: <4AB9EAE7.6090108@stillbilde.net> References: <20090921112657.GW95398@hoeg.nl> <20090922135435.36a3d40e@lazybytes.org> <864oqu1urm.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20090923132036.57767deb@lazybytes.org> <4AB9EAE7.6090108@stillbilde.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 В Wed, 23 Sep 2009 11:31:19 +0200 "Svein Skogen (listmail account)" <svein-listmail@stillbilde.net> пишет: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Sergey Vinogradov wrote: > > В Wed, 23 Sep 2009 00:26:05 +0200 > > Dag-Erling Smørgrav <des@des.no> пишет: > > > >> Sergey Vinogradov <boogie@lazybytes.org> writes: > >>> Despite the zsh(1) has appropriate license, it needs autotools and > >>> iconv (both GPL AFAIK), so it's hard to include in the base > >>> system. The things in the base system I always wondered about are > >>> sendmail and bind9. These are pretty heavy, and definitely are > >>> not used in every single installation. Maybe someday I'll see > >>> sendmail and bind9 in ports instead of base system. And yes, I > >>> know about WITHOUT_BIND= and WITHOUT_SENDMAIL= :) > >> 1) Even in sh mode, zsh is not sufficiently POSIX-compliant to > >> replace our /bin/sh (and I say this as the maintainer of the zsh > >> port) > > I think I've made my point unclear: I fully understand that, and I > > don't propose zsh(1) replacing sh(1). I just think it would be > > handy to have zsh(1) in the base system. Not replacing sh(1), but > > as one more piece of software. > > Wouldn't that bring back (among others) perl into the base? I seem to > remember there was some effort spent on removing that a while ago... > > //Svein > Well, zsh(1) doesn't have perl as run, or build dependency directly. However, autoconf, which is involved in zsh(1) build process does depend on perl. - -- wbr, Boo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkq572UACgkQCt8hfbw1GpYv/ACdHC4fvjDPgNhLXsB6UAD6RPFk YYQAn2S/jsxSH6aitLwmNvqube6oIS5P =5wZh -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20090923135029.69a016f8>