Date: Sat, 28 Jan 2006 02:19:47 +0000 From: Gary Palmer <gpalmer@freebsd.org> To: Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com> Cc: Garance A Drosihn <drosih@rpi.edu>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [TEST/REVIEW] CPU accounting patches Message-ID: <43DAD4C3.1060909@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <43DA7BAB.7030602@rogers.com> References: <20060125201450.GE25397@cirb503493.alcatel.com.au> <56988.1138220896@critter.freebsd.dk> <20060126101138.GA40773@uk.tiscali.com> <20060127024432.GT69162@funkthat.com> <20060127085653.GA51554@uk.tiscali.com> <43D9E1D2.6060207@rogers.com> <p06230918c000153b7d09@[128.113.24.47]> <43DA7BAB.7030602@rogers.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Jakubik wrote: > As i just mentioned, i don't know of any colo that charges for your > power usage, you pay by U's and bandwidth. My work has 100+ systems in the server room at the office. No huge bandwith bills, etc, as this is the QA and dev lab. However, power and heat dissipation are huge issues for us. So please do not think that these are issues just because you are not aware of colo providers that charge for power. I know a number of companies who host server farms on their own presmises, not at colo facilities, who face challenges getting sufficient power and cooling for their systems.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43DAD4C3.1060909>