Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2002 11:15:50 -0700 From: Brooks Davis <brooks@one-eyed-alien.net> To: Patrick Thomas <root@utility.clubscholarship.com> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: an and wi netgraph enabled ? Message-ID: <20020602111549.A19588@Odin.AC.HMC.Edu> In-Reply-To: <20020602101156.K18408-100000@utility.clubscholarship.com>; from root@utility.clubscholarship.com on Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 10:13:30AM -0700 References: <20020602101156.K18408-100000@utility.clubscholarship.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Jun 02, 2002 at 10:13:30AM -0700, Patrick Thomas wrote: >=20 > Are the `an` and `wi` network drivers "netgraph enabled" ? >=20 > (cisco aironet and lucent 802.11b cards) >=20 > If not, does this mean there is no way to use them in a netgraph setting ? They work more or less like ethernet devices so they should work with netgraph with the single issue that in normal ad-hoc or infrastructure modes you can't send packets with a different MAC so they can't be bridged. You can do with with prismII cards using hostap mode. -- Brooks --=20 Any statement of the form "X is the one, true Y" is FALSE. PGP fingerprint 655D 519C 26A7 82E7 2529 9BF0 5D8E 8BE9 F238 1AD4 --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iD8DBQE8+mDVXY6L6fI4GtQRAq5pAKCRFNgk6d799wklNf55HANCKWpclQCfTuyA 3VSzUhOs2CjzPQoZ7Lr68L4= =s91r -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --vkogqOf2sHV7VnPd-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020602111549.A19588>