Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 11 May 2014 13:48:45 +1200
From:      Jonathan Chen <jonc@chen.org.nz>
To:        portmgr-feedback@freebsd.org
Cc:        FreeBSD Ports <ports@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: ACTION REQUIRED - Unstaged Ports being DEPRECATED on June 31st.
Message-ID:  <CAJuc1zOvQAJB81BEThcpGh%2BGn6WbP74LAi3zQ=AWkTn-wCOyhg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <536E46E0.7030906@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <536E46E0.7030906@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 11 May 2014 03:33, Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@freebsd.org> wrote:
[...]
> So we will be DEPRECATING and resetting maintainer on all unstaged ports
> on June 31st.
>
> These ports will be set to EXPIRE on August 31st and will then be
> removed from the tree. They will not be restored unless someone stages
> them as well.

The problem I have with this decision is that there are some complex
ports which have no single maintainer (case in point: eclipse-devel);
and whose patch-submitters only occasionally dabble with the port.
Staging support for these ports sometimes tend to be over-complex, and
one that yield no immediate benefit to the submitter.

And then there are the ports which have their have their home-baked
installer, where adding staging support could mean wholesale changes
to the port.

It used to be the philosophy of FreeBSD to favour pragmatism over
ideology. I must admit to some disappointment over this decision to
force staging as the "one true way".

Cheers.
-- 
Jonathan Chen <jonc@chen.org.nz>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CAJuc1zOvQAJB81BEThcpGh%2BGn6WbP74LAi3zQ=AWkTn-wCOyhg>