Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 11:52:50 +0200 From: Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@FreeBSD.org> To: Xin LI <delphij@delphij.net> Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.org, Mike Jakubik <mikej@rogers.com>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-geom@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Journaling UFS with gjournal. Message-ID: <20060622095250.GD30568@garage.freebsd.pl> In-Reply-To: <1150833586.24301.1.camel@spirit> References: <20060619131101.GD1130@garage.freebsd.pl> <44984A91.8040805@rogers.com> <20060620193630.GA8007@garage.freebsd.pl> <1150833586.24301.1.camel@spirit>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Wed, Jun 21, 2006 at 03:59:46AM +0800, Xin LI wrote: +> ??? 2006-06-20?????? 21:36 +0200???Pawel Jakub Dawidek????????? +> > The performance impact is big for large files, because in theory we have +> > to write the data twice. +> > Yes, it eliminates need for SU, but there are reasons, that you still +> > want to use SU, eg. for snapshots. +> +> Em... IIRC SU and snapshots are independent, no? Oops. Yes, you are right. bgfsck depends on SU, not snapshots. -- Pawel Jakub Dawidek http://www.wheel.pl pjd@FreeBSD.org http://www.FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer Am I Evil? Yes, I Am! [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFEmmhyForvXbEpPzQRAohQAJ9cSI5QpRK5ghxwucJ91+fshMSIigCfeDjD UHVHqWF9yKOf+SsGJViLP5c= =nTBz -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060622095250.GD30568>