Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2007 09:33:19 +0200 From: "Claus Guttesen" <kometen@gmail.com> To: "Palle Girgensohn" <girgen@pingpong.net> Cc: freebsd-performance@freebsd.org Subject: Re: AMD or Intel? Message-ID: <b41c75520709140033jc07761y88af8e051174e19f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <26F41A5DACB2D2CB43A5829E@c-6254e155.1521-1-64736c12.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se> References: <E6C9DBADAE3839B380B736D7@rambutan.pingpong.net> <cone.1189710437.247473.77599.5001@35st.simplicato.com> <1F219879A7E5C565C96109FF@c-2f56e155.1521-1-64736c12.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se> <cone.1189727090.40770.77599.5001@35st.simplicato.com> <26F41A5DACB2D2CB43A5829E@c-6254e155.1521-1-64736c12.cust.bredbandsbolaget.se>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Obviously if you can afford SCSI/SAS performance will likely be even > > better. However make sure you can get management program for the > > controller. At the very least some type of notification if the raid is > > degraded. > > We will probably go for SCSI. HP DL380 with "HP SmartArray", aka ciss. This server is very solid and is fully supported by FreeBSD 6.2 and 7.0. We have one with 4 146 GB sas-disks in raid 1+0. Just make sure you get at least 256 MB cache. The raid-management tool is very easy to use. -- regards Claus When lenity and cruelty play for a kingdom, the gentlest gamester is the soonest winner. Shakespeare
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?b41c75520709140033jc07761y88af8e051174e19f>