Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2003 13:20:50 -0700 From: Scott Long <scott_long@btc.adaptec.com> To: Alfred Perlstein <bright@mu.org> Cc: cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/conf LINT Message-ID: <3E84AEA2.2080008@btc.adaptec.com> In-Reply-To: <200303282005.h2SK5e04045153@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200303282005.h2SK5e04045153@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030328200824.GJ48996@elvis.mu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alfred Perlstein wrote: > * Scott Long [030328 12:05] wrote: > > >scottl 2003/03/28 12:05:40 PST > > > > FreeBSD src repository > > > > Modified files: (Branch: RELENG_4_8) > > sys/i386/conf LINT > > Log: > > Late MFC: Remove AAC_COMPAT_LINUX and replace it with a separate > aac_linux > > module. > > > > Approved by: re(murray) > > > > Revision Changes Path > > 1.749.2.138.2.1 +0 -4 src/sys/i386/conf/LINT > > > Isn't doing something like this to -stable a BAD THING? meaning, > making AAC_COMPAT_LINUX not do what it used to? > > People shipping things with canned configs or whatever get screwed > by this, or people defining it some other way than via config. > > The work is of course appreciated, but perhaps having _both_ work > for 4.x would have been more prudent. > > I don't object to this change, I'm just upset by it. > The bits that used to be enabled by AAC_COMPAT_LINUX are now auto-enabled by having COMPAT_LINUX. I see your point about canned configs. If Murray feels strongly about it, I'll put AAC_COMPAT_LINUX back into /sys/conf/options as a dummy option. Scott
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E84AEA2.2080008>