Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 11 Apr 2007 14:58:00 -0700
From:      "Jack Vogel" <jfvogel@gmail.com>
To:        "Anne Marcel Roorda" <marcel@piglet.slowthinkers.net>
Cc:        freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: WOL question
Message-ID:  <2a41acea0704111458k2d8ae707j3d89577fcbb32128@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200704112113.l3BLDXUu063020@piglet.slowthinkers.net>
References:  <kimimeister@gmail.com> <42b497160704111336m24249f7axa8b80ba84083bd97@mail.gmail.com> <200704112113.l3BLDXUu063020@piglet.slowthinkers.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/11/07, Anne Marcel Roorda <marcel@piglet.slowthinkers.net> wrote:
>
> In message <42b497160704111336m24249f7axa8b80ba84083bd97@mail.gmail.com>, "Kimi
>  Ostro" writes:
>
> > On 10/04/07, Jack Vogel <jfvogel@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I am hoping someone here who has more familiarity with the ACPI
> > > code can enlighten me....
> > >
> > > I have an internal bug filed complaining that FreeBSD disables
> > > wake-on-lan on the hardware.
> > >
> > > Now, I would like to have explicit WOL support added into the
> > > em driver, but before I even worry about that I need to understand
> > > where the kernel turns this off without the driver even needed.
> >
> > This isnt specific to em, it also happens on other ethernet cards
> > (rl(8) fxp(8)) that support WOL/MagicPacket. Might be idea to check PR
> > database see if someone has same problem, maybe fix? it was nice
> > installing ports/net/wol and getting a computer to fire up remotely,
> > but as soon as it rebooted from FreeBSD, WOL stopped :(
>
> Hi,
>
>   FreeBSD isn't disabling WOL. It needs to be enabled on shutdown
> for most cards.
>
>   I have patches for ifconfig, and the xl driver to enable WOL.
>
>   It should be possible to add support to other drivers, but
> it's different for each card.
>
>   You should be able to find a diff against 5-stable in the archives.
> Changes against -CURRENT aren't _that_ different.

So, why isnt this in 6.X then?

I've now had email with Nate Lawson about ACPI and think I
know how to make it work properly, of course I havent yet
tested the theory, if it works like it sounds then its not going
to be too hard to do this.

Jack



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2a41acea0704111458k2d8ae707j3d89577fcbb32128>