Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 09:09:28 -0700 From: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG> To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Rewrite cvsup & portupgrade in C Message-ID: <20040707160928.GA56137@VARK.homeunix.com> In-Reply-To: <20040707084142.GA80580@dragon.nuxi.com> References: <E1Bhd1M-000KEo-Nz@smp500.sitetronics.com> <20040707041220.GA35497@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <6.1.0.6.1.20040706212904.03d4fe00@popserver.sfu.ca> <200407071034.22187.morten@rodal.no> <20040707084142.GA80580@dragon.nuxi.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Wed, Jul 07, 2004, David O'Brien wrote: > On Wed, Jul 07, 2004 at 10:34:11AM +0200, Morten Rodal wrote: > > On Wednesday 07 July 2004 06:30, Colin Percival wrote: > > > At 21:12 06/07/2004, Steve Kargl wrote: > > > >Is it really too hard to do > > > > 1) pkgadd -r cvsup > > > > 2) or use sysinstall to install cvsup > > > > 3) or portinstall cvsup > > > > 4) or cd /usr/ports/net/cvsup && make install > > > > > > cvsup isn't the problem. ezm3 is the problem. > > > > The main reason for leaving ezm3 behind from my point of view is the lack > > of support for IPv6. (It should be noted that I am not sure whether it > > is cvsup or ezm3 that does not support IPv6) > > Uh, ezm3 is a *compiler*. Hint, does GCC support IPv6?? It was my impression that it's the runtime, not the compiler, that's difficult to port and maintain.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040707160928.GA56137>