Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2000 03:16:01 -0400 (EDT) From: Matt Heckaman <matt@LUCIDA.QC.CA> To: will@FreeBSD.org Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports/20238: New port addition. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0009160313300.91216-100000@alpha.lucida.qc.ca> In-Reply-To: <200009160422.VAA35355@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Thanks Will! Ironically enough though, 1.4.1 is now out. I've already
updated my local ports here and thanks to Mark (the author) and his
willingness to work with me on mmucl & FreeBSD, virtually no patching is
required except to honour ${PREFIX} et al.
My question is: Should I be sending that diff to you (Will) or should I
simply send-pr them as I did with the initial port addition?
Cheers,
Matt
On Fri, 15 Sep 2000 will@FreeBSD.org wrote:
: Synopsis: New port addition.
:
: State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
: State-Changed-By: will
: State-Changed-When: Fri Sep 15 21:22:06 PDT 2000
: State-Changed-Why:
: Committed, thanks!
:
: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=20238
:
* Matt Heckaman - mailto:matt@lucida.qc.ca http://www.lucida.qc.ca/ *
* GPG fingerprint - A9BC F3A8 278E 22F2 9BDA BFCF 74C3 2D31 C035 5390 *
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.2 (FreeBSD)
Comment: http://www.lucida.qc.ca/pgp
iD8DBQE5wx40dMMtMcA1U5ARAvOTAJ9fD9JbmtXSemzgdb3ieg79ibFELwCfX966
BSOKou0UFXxbcU4MqWO31sI=
=qG2b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0009160313300.91216-100000>