Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 17:56:38 +0300 From: Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> To: Paul Zimmermann <Paul.Zimmermann@inria.fr> Cc: hackers@freebsd.org, numerics@freebsd.org Subject: Re: kargl@freebsd.org, sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu, vincenzo.innocente@cern.ch, riemannic@gmail.com, johnmather@sidefx.com Message-ID: <ZrI5pocdm0Zbl9pW@kib.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <p9u0ed713j4u.fsf@coriandre.loria.fr> References: <p9u0ed713j4u.fsf@coriandre.loria.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 02:56:01PM +0200, Paul Zimmermann wrote: > Hi, > > we have updated our comparison with FreeBSD 14.1: > > https://members.loria.fr/PZimmermann/papers/accuracy.pdf > > Remaining issues in 14.1: > > * the powl function is not thread-safe This is for 80-bit long double, am I right? And it is because of the global vars passing values between functions? I tried to hack something in https://reviews.freebsd.org/D46237
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?ZrI5pocdm0Zbl9pW>